That doesn't make it the way to go, now does it? And yet somehow the comparison between the ownership of human beings by other human beings and the wealthy paying higher taxes just doesn't *quite* ring as true as it should, does it?
I'd cry crocodile tears for the "poor, poor wealthy" as they consume more resources than many small countries but I can't even really manage that much.
You can advocate for 90% taxation or even 100% taxation if you wish. I wasn't.
I will not. I have no interest in making you. And I doubt seriously if you would ever be effected by such a tax.
I was merely responding to what I found to be flaws in your reasoning.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(446 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
