Reply #80: I don't see a resemblance either, but [View All]

what I saw as something worth at least looking at was a connection between one Bush White House male prostitute scandal and another Bush White House male prostitute scandal. The first one supposedly did involve 15-year-olds, but that's not what created the interest in looking at it, I don't think.

JimJeff may not have been involved, but even if he wasn't, it seems worth taking a look to see whether any of the other names involved looked familiar, since the Bushies do tend to prize "loyalty" and to recycle personnel from the Bush 41 administration to this one. (That could have been one explanation for their ready trust of JimJeff who, if he's indeed 47, would have been a young man of 23 in 1980.)

So I think it was worth checking out for reasons that have nothing to do with automatically equating gays with pedophiles.