You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #74: so THAT's why Gore lost, eh? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #29
74. so THAT's why Gore lost, eh?
couldn't be because he couldn't be a successful candidate, could it?
couldn't be because the DLC (you know, Lieberman and gang) were in charge of the party, could it?
couldn't be because when speaking of the DLC you ARE talking about two groups (along with Republicans) that are intensely similar?
couldn't be that Gore was not allowed to have a populist message because the corporate DLC didn't like it, could it?

Looks like Nader was right...or maybe you haven't been looking at the actions of the Democratic party since November 2000 :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC