Yes, there were acts of terror, including 9/11, but Bush created a much larger monster that could have been handled in a different way? Do you believe that? Do you believe we could have used diplomacy and economic leverage to get the countries that were harboring "terrorists" to help us capture them without creating millions more terrorists in the process? Has this turned out to be one of the biggest blunders in military and national history? What is your opinion of Bush's role in the "war on terror"?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
