You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #65: Angry and defensive just because he's not automatically [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
RazzleDazzle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #59
65. Angry and defensive just because he's not automatically
buying into the company line on this subject?

I think his questions have shown only strong cynicism, with which I personally definitely agree, as well as intelligent, and probing if skeptical questions.

I don't think there's going to be a pandemic. Perhaps not at all, but certainly not this year with the avian flu virus. They couldn't make the West Nile Virus into a pandemic either.

The very biggest red flag, btw, is that George W. Bush showed keen interest and prior concern about this as a subject matter for his governance. That would be about the first things EVER, aside from wrecking-ball legislation aimed at destroying this country, its people and economy on the one hand, and all the power-grabbing Executive Orders, gutting of rules and regulations, and other similar stunts on the other. There's a reason he's interested, and it isn't because he has an altruistic bone in his body, anywhere. No, more likely because it offers yet another path to full dicatorial power he has yearned for -- aloud, even! -- since his first installation.

No, I'm not saying the Avian flu and talk of a pandemic is all a rightwing plot. OTOH, they (this administration) really are promoting it about how they promoted the "economy's going to be in recession" prior to taking office, which is yet another thing that raises a red flag. Further, a fully objective pursuit of an answer to the question cui bono? leads one down some interesting paths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC