You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A state senator and evolution/creation [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 06:33 PM
Original message
A state senator and evolution/creation
Advertisements [?]
One of my state senators (website here: http://www.scstatehouse.net/members/bios/0554545388.html) is promoting a bill that would change the way evolution is taught in S.C. He wants the classes to include material that would call into question the theory of evolution, and encourage students to investigate other alternatives. He says he doesn't want creationism or ID taught. Sounds relatively harmless so far. Maybe.

I just saw an interview with him on the local news. He repeated the above statements. Then he said, "This will basically say to those who believe in Darwinism, 'prove it.'"

Okay, now it's clear that he's using this as a wedge, trying to get creationism/ID foot in the door.

Every time I get into this discussion with a creationist/IDer, I notice that they do not offer evidence for their belief; they simply rely on questions about evolution. When one of those evolution questions is unanswerable or not proven, they lock on to that. Their belief is that creationism/ID is the default answer. Which is logically ridiculous.

So I have an idea. I emailed this state senator and proposed that he sponsor an event in which creation and evolution are debated. I suggested this be held at a large auditorium and that it be broadcast on our state's public TV system. The creation side chooses their expert on creation and the evolution side chooses their expert on evolution. A moderator would then ask questions about the origin of life and each expert would get to answer using information from their belief/theory. Answers that concentrated on the other side's belief would not be allowed. The point of the debate would not be to tear down the other side, but rather for each side to support their own belief on its own merits, and let the viewers decide.

The idea being, of course, to see what exactly the creationist/IDer comes up with if he/she isn't allowed to spend their allotted time trashing evolution. I don't think it can be done. I'll post any response I get from the senator's office. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC