Reply #35: Uh oh [View All]

You should be careful about how you recap things, especially when the evidence above contradicts you.

I asked the rhetorical question about rather than removing crosses, churches might consider removing national flags from their sanctuaries (post 1). In post 8, you excitedly conjectured that I was proposing a law banning the flag from sanctuaries -- or so I surmised from your use of the exclamation point. I, of course, made no such suggestion and said so in my response (post 20).

Your reply (post 21) couldn't fathom why I was responding to you in spite of the clear chain of posts and responses. I agreed with your statement that you are confused (post 24), and you immediately shot back (post 25) with a response that showed you hadn't yet comprehended the gist of my original post. At this point, I was beginning to doubt that English is your first language, and that you were the victim of a particularly bad internet translation program.

You re-asserted (post 30) that you had asked a legitimate question, against all evidence to the contrary and Dem Agog's mild reproof. I stated again (post 33) that I had given you a legitimate answer to your allegedly legitimate question, which answer you still seem not to have grasped (post 34). Yes indeed, the substance of my comments have flown clear over your head, and I agree that it's time to let this one go. I hope you get a better English translation program soon.