You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: All denials to the contrary means [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 03:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. All denials to the contrary means
means they are actually pretty well advanced in the planning, so I am betting, (unfortuntely) that the Draft will be ennacted as soon as the staffing crisis HITS the DoD... best case scenaerio AFTER the election... worst case scenario by the summer of 2004. Why would Bush do this AFTER the election? By the way he can do this whether he wins or not... and I am betting he will... if he did it NOW it will guarantee he will not get reelected (Rove knows this and I think they can keep jerking the Reserves and National Guard until AFTER November of 2004, maybe) ... even if he looses, he signs the executive order and gets the bill from Congress (it is ready to go), the next president will have a hell of a time STOPPING that machine once it is activated... I don't care what the name of the President is. Poltiically it would cripple the next President before that President is even sworn in... and the riots, oh the riots... that will fill America's streets, if history is a guide, will make the Summer of '65 look like a walk in the park... so if your name is George Bush and you really want ot cripple your successor, the Draft is just the ticket, no pun intended.

The only POSSITIVE of a Draft is that it will make politics RELEVANT once again for middle America and the side issue of DEMOCRATIZING the country... these are balanced by WAY TOO MANY NEGATIVES... such as cost, social, economic, you mention it, traiining, morale problems, disipline problems et al.. but point is, the Draft is coming, and all DENIALS point to it.

Now for teh usual suspects this is a strategic view of the matter... not an ideological one so try to look at things STRATEGICALLY. If you are between the ages of 16-25 start your file RIGHT NOW for consicentious Objector, though be advised the way the Bill reads, you will be REQUIRED to serve, even if NOT in the military. Yes you read correctly 16 is a good age to start that file to present to the Draft Boards if that number should come.

Yuo may want to contact any of the groups helping active service personnel right now, as to the requirements...

Oh and for the record I am not in favor of one, but can read the hand writing on the wall RIGHT NOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC