62. Fine. Where's the "proven time and again" evidence
When the "bigger than Watergate" expose was published a couple of months ago on the New Zealand web site they had to put in a disclaimer saying they had no evidence of actual vote fraud associated with the machines.
Do you have a programmer who rigged the code ?
A technician who altered vote totals ?
All I've ever seen from these people is what could happen.
And when the vote counts mirror poll results doesn't that tell you anything ?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
