You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: No, no and Hell no [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. No, no and Hell no
Edited on Wed Nov-05-03 09:59 PM by bluestateguy
All that does is free up campaign resources for the other side to go trolling for votes in Minnesota, Pennslyvania or even California. All giving the South to Bush for free does is make us have to work all that much harder for states that we should be able to win comfortably.

On edit: I would play hard in Florida, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee and Louisiana. I would make a 50% effort in Georgia and North Carolina and let Bush have Texas, Mississippi, Alabama and South Carolina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC