You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: "no longer exists in significant numbers in the national economy" loses to [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. "no longer exists in significant numbers in the national economy" loses to
the SS DI requirement of being unable to perform any job in the US economy.

She conceeds that she can perform the job.

She conceeds that the jobs do exist in the economy - just not that many.

That loses on its face - SSDI just is not unemployment ins.

But should the situation depress her into a clinical depression that can not be cured with drugs and which prevents work, she has a shot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC