|
Edited on Fri Nov-14-03 10:19 AM by HFishbine
but to answer your question about why the pundits give Dean and Gephardt the edge, it's because of a legitimate consideration of who's leading in the early primary states. Unfortunatley, a candidate who's strongest support is in late-primary states is at a disadvantage.
BTW, what an odd question in the NBC/WSJ poll. They say ""Let me mention some people who might seek the Democratic nomination for president in 2004."
"Might?" All of the candidates they proceed to mention are delcared candidates and, in fact, ARE seeking the Democratic nomination. Why would they phrase is that way?
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
