You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone else believe the March payroll numbers are a bit faked? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 11:21 AM
Original message
Does anyone else believe the March payroll numbers are a bit faked?
Advertisements [?]
Does anyone else believe the March payroll numbers are a bit faked?

Granted I once ran an International Corp’s US Tax office, so I know what “could” be done under the US common paymaster rules; so perhaps I suspect these folks of actually doing such because I assume GOP control extends to IRS enforcement of the rules.

In any case, payroll increases from moving Iraq jobs to a US common paymaster – nah – far fetched.

How about an arbitrary look back and find new consultants effort for a one time kick?

Maybe new seasonal adjustments that do not reflect hiring of agricultural workers, and other outdoor jobs like landscaping, construction, recreation departments, zoos at this point in those new seasonal adjustments? Perhaps illegal folks going on the payroll under fake SS#, replacing cash paid out to “consultants"? Perhaps we are only counting the first 30 day “guarantee” payroll payment to new commission-based sales jobs – giving us a "professional-and-business-services industry" jobs kick?

Now 308,000 new jobs in March is 513,000 new jobs since the beginning of the year. 759,000 since last August, with the manufacturing sector did not lose jobs for the first time in 43 months, but how do we explain a Jobs increase but hours work decrease –“Despite the increase in jobs, hours worked in the economy fell by 0.1 percent. The average workweek also fell by a tenth of an hour to 33.7 hours. Hours worked in the manufacturing fell 0.3 percent, with a drop of 0.1 percentage points in the average workweek to 40.9."

Does it bother anyone that Cheney locked down the numbers 4 days ago for his speech on the economic situation speech he is giving this noon? Or that secrets on Wall Street included a 250,000 to 300,000 number last Friday? Indeed I was amazed that Bond selling was held back to 2 minutes before today’s release- for Wall Street that is pretty close to honoring a promise to keep a secret!

http://money.cnn.com /
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=568&ncid=749&e=1&u=/nm...
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
http://www.bls.gov/cps /
http://www.economist.com/world/na/displayStory.cfm?story_id=2553350
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC