You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CARBON MADNESS [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 10:26 AM
Original message
CARBON MADNESS
Advertisements [?]
Source: Weekly Times (AU)

“When the facts changed, scientist David Evans changed his mind about global warming” headlined The Australian newspaper last Friday July 18, 2008.

In what should be a must read for all, David Evans BSc, BE-EE, MA (Sydney), MS-EE, MS-Stat, PhD EE (Stanford) and consultant to Australian Greenhouse Office from 1999 to 2005 reveals that “the world has spent $50 billion on global warming since 1990 and we have not found any actual evidence that carbon emissions cause global warming” “Computer models and theoretical calculations are not evidence, they are just theory”.

David Evans devoted six years to carbon accounting, building models for the Australian Greenhouse Office. “I am the rocket scientist who wrote the carbon accounting model that measures Australia’s compliance with the Kyoto Protocol” he says.

“But since 1999 new evidence has seriously weakened the case that carbon emissions are the main cause of global warming.” In fact, “the new ice cores show that in the past six global warmings over the past half million years the temperature rises occurred on average 800 years BEFORE the accompanying rise in atmospheric carbon, which says something about which was cause and which was effect!”......



Read more: http://www.weeklytimes.com.au/2008/07_july/23_07_08/story_05.html



This has pretty much been my theory for a long time. I still think we should triple our efforts to reduce pollution, but I also want as accurate science as we can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC