You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #2: What? No nukes? [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy

BeFree

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-13-07 06:35 PM
Response to Original message

2. What? No nukes?

I thought nukes were the most economical? Then why is this company wanting coal? </snark>

The fact of the matter is that solar is coming on strong. And solar is a choke on centralized power producers like this Texas company. Frankly, any shareholder of TXU should be greatly concerned with the loss this company faces when it becomes burdened with power plants that become idle as solar takes evermore of the market share.

Too, if enough of us complain, the EPA and the new congress will not allow any further emission growth, thereby strangling TXU's idea in it's infancy. If.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.