22. My argument is not based on the UN Partition Plan.
Edited on Tue Jun-19-07 12:39 PM by Shaktimaan
That was never enacted anyway.
Israel is a recognized nation. No one can argue against their jurisdiction over west Jerusalem at this point.
The idea that the western wall (for example) automatically belongs to a state that does not exist and can hold no legal claim to it, is absurd. If anything it is disputed territory. (As the treaties signed by the PA and Israel contend.) What legal reason exists to support their claim?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
