Reply #96: Here is Ross's response to Greening, not an apology [View All]

http://gordonssite.tripod.com/id4.html

This is dated 12/6/06 and in this he doesn't apologize or imply that he screwed up, but rather that Dr. Greening is a fruitcake. He also discusses various rebuttals on the JREF forum. Is this Ross's answer to which you referred above? Or is there something more current?

Edited to add: I am not the only person to have read NIST's thermite "calculations" as above and, therefore, that Ross is not misrepresenting NIST.

"NIST's argument against thermite having been used in demolition supposes that thermite was the only method used. Since Steven Jones and others suggesting thermite use do not endorse pure-thermite theories, NIST's is essentially a straw-man argument."

http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/nist/WTC_FAQ_reply.html

Here is an excellent, detailed rebuttal to NIST's report, by the way:

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/12/350777.shtml