You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #14: They don't state in the article that they knew of bombs but they [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
hangloose Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-04 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. They don't state in the article that they knew of bombs but they
paint a picture of destruction in the subbasement that appears to be caused by something more significant than an explosion on the 94 floor. Please note the excerpts in the narrative posted. How does one explain what they saw, could liquid fuel have caused the displacement of 50 ton pieces of equipment and loss of concrete walls in the basement? Maybe but please explain how? if people were burned near the lobby OK, if smoke was in the lobby OK. But that's much different than whole sale destruction which was reported in the basement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC