Reply #56: what CAN be deduced [View All]

But there is photographic evidence that needs to be convincingly explained by Mercurio et al. Thus far their explanations are superficial,unscientific.
1. We have the aeronautical wizardry of said hijackers. My take? Impossible. Remote control on this point alone becomes much much more feasible.
2. A plane did hit the Pentagon. But no witness who saw the plane can positively identify it as Flight 77. That is physically impossible.
3. Then there is the flash precipitating the fuel explosion. This cannot be explained away as fuel initiated. It was light,bright and had sonic wave properties. This suggests shaped charges and/or a bomb or missile.
4.And the hole into the A-E drive with that scant amount of debris attributed to its making? How is this explained when the plane essentially disappears upon impact?
5. And I am indeed curious as to why NO body parts are strewn on the Pentalawn when the Pentagon's video release clearly shows an explosion upon impact by something.There is something too neat and tidy about this.
6. And why was that video obviously tampered with? Where is the goddamn plane? The Pentagon is hiding something. Absolutely.

As for the DNA. Who collected it? That's a more pertinent question than who analyzed it.

Whatever the truth is... a few summations can be made.
1. The plane was not flown in by manual control. It was controlled from the outside.
2. Shaped charges and or a bomb were planted in the building or on the plane(possibly carrying a missile) and timed to go off at the plane's entry.