New abuse photos- Was ACLU "had"- NYTimes prints correction today [View All]

This paragraph was added today to the NY Times article on the Bush administration's refusal to comply with a court order to turn over the remaing abuse photos and videos:

Correction: July 26, 2005, Tuesday:
An article on Saturday about a federal judge's order regarding photographs and videotapes related to the Abu Ghraib prison scandal misstated a deadline and the response by Defense Department lawyers. The government was given until Friday to black out some identifying details in the material, not to release it. Defense Department lawyers met that deadline, but asked the court to block the public release of the materials. They did not refuse to cooperate with an order for the materials' release.

So - the judge said fix them but nothing about releasing them?!

Here's the court order (pdf) -
It does look like a lot of "redacting" but no turning over! Also, that the DOD showed them to the judge "in camera". Note the mention of photos that show so much you can't even blur them! Also - a mention of photo not from Darby.

I also see it says "part 1" but don't see any part 2 posted.
Any good sleuths here?

http://www.aclu.org/Files/OpenFile.cfm?id=18396