Democratic Underground - I mentioned that the delegates could change and that they weren't bound to their

Reply #31: I mentioned that the delegates could change and that they weren't bound to their [View All]

Horse with no Name

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Mar-07-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #25

31. I mentioned that the delegates could change and that they weren't bound to their

candidate and was basically called a liar.

The caucus was designed to circumvent the will of the people. Proving you could stack the caucuses and pay off, arm twist, threaten the delegates until you get the desired result.
There are many instances of obama people locking the Clinton people out of the caucuses, threatening them, etc.
One of my Democratic buddies that lives in the next town over told me this morning that they got to the caucus and nobody knew how to run it so they all went home.
One of my Democratic buddies in the next county said that for some reason the caucus chair never showed up with the rolls so their caucus was canceled.
These were heavy Clinton areas that this happened.
It is the biggest sham I think I have ever experienced.

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

Reply #31: I mentioned that the delegates could change and that they weren't bound to their [View All]