17. Hillary is a tempest in a teapot. Obama is not against a re-vote and has absolutely everything
to gain from one. It's the uncertainty about whether or not there will be a re-vote that benefits Hillary. Once the re-vote is in place (and the MI legislature has to sell the cost to MI voters, keep in mind), then her pop. vote and delegate counts she won against Uncommitted go "poof" and the gap between her and Obama is then huge until at least June. She knows there will be no re-vote so she's just milking a stance that she thinks shows she's fair.
Does anyone here believe that Obama will not do better in MI (with an energized electorate and only two candidates on the ballot) than Uncommitted? Seriously? (Rendell doesn't count).
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
