You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #77: as explained several times: it was submitted for the justices to consider per standard practice [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #72
77. as explained several times: it was submitted for the justices to consider per standard practice
The nutjob bringing this case filed an emergency petition for stay with the Justice assigned to circuit from which the case originated. That Justice was Souter, and as is almost always the case with this sort of emergency petition, he denied it. The nutjob then, as permitted by the SCOTUS rules, re-submitted his petition to another Justice, namely Thomas. Thomas, following standard practice when a once-rejected emergency petition is re-filed, referred the matter to the court for consideration at its regular conference, which happens to be today. It really wouldn't have mattered which justice the nutjob went to second -- even if he had gone to Ruth Bader Ginsburg, she would have done the same thing as Thomas--kicked it to the conference so it could be disposed of once and for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC