I've heard too many people make too many wild claims about various campaigns. They say things weren't done when the truth is they never bothered to find out what was and wasn't done. Did you get your information in your local right wing newspaper? Then make your judgment based on their reporting? Or did you read the pundits that can do literally anything better than the candidate? Or did you listen to the left wing, was she not ranting and raving against the machine enough? If you can't articulate anything more than "lackluster campaign", you didn't really pay attention.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
