You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #61: We have a lot of time... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
61. We have a lot of time...
We may see Hillary entering the field.

But I don't think she'll be an automatic winner in the primaries. As we saw this time, the talk of "electability" may be one reason that helped Kerry, whether it was true or not.

There's a great chance, that Hillary may have great early success like Dean enjoyed, but in time people may question whether she can really win. I think the voters in Democratic primaries will not nominate another northeasterner. In Kerry's case, voters were impressed with his war service and long experience in the senate.

As we get farther away from the Clinton years, the Clintons' clout may fade. We may see some interesting up and comers entering the field. We may also see several southern governers run (like Warner of VA or Easely of NC or Bradeson of TN). I don't know much about these people, but I'm sure we will over time.

There is always the possibility that Kerry and Edwards may make a deal, that if one enters, the other will not. Even Lieberman, who isn't liked by most (and understandably so), was decent enough in stating that he would not run if Gore decided to again.

Personally, I'm not so sure I'd like to see Kerry. I like him. I think he would have made a great president...but he had his chance...

The only person I think has a decent chance in '08, that ran this time, would be Clark. He had a rough start - got in the game late, was relatively inexperienced...This really hurt his chances. But he really improved over time. He was a great surrogate and campaigner for Kerry.

The security situation will still be precarious and most likely fucked up after another 3 years to say the least. Clark's foreign policy experience wouldn't hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC