President chimp would probably burn alive every sex offender he could put his hands on because it would make such a great reality TV show w/ him as the emcee. Nothing wrong w/ that IMO, as long as the networks pay for it and not the taxpayer.
Why it's off-point is that Teri S. is not a sex offender. The equation is: blameless life=life worth saving, regardless of the life-holder's wishes because only god can take a life; yeah right. Vs. sex-offender whose life shouldn't be worth a nickle=not worth saving. Sorry, but I don't see them as being related. Nobody's saying it's either one or the other are they?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
