You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Things that make you go hmmm.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 07:21 AM
Original message
Things that make you go hmmm....
Advertisements [?]
Why do we seldom, if ever, hear about "classical conservatives"? Ever notice how conservatives always draw on the "classical liberal tradition"? This is, of course, their way of rationalizing the fact that none of the Founders or any of the rebels against the crown could, then, or at any time be called "conservatives." What the hell would they have been trying to CONSERVE at THAT point? In fact, what move forward in this country's history can be attributed to anyone calling themselves at the period of said move forward "conservative"?

No, really, I'm curious about this...


(potential flame bait) If the ownership of guns is a sacred, inalienable right for all Americans, why are they not provided by the manufacturers free of charge?


Why do we seldom hear the term "socialized legal system"? Or why don't we hear it to the extent that we hear "socialized medicine"? Is it possible that America values representation by counsel in court regardless of whether the client can afford it over treatment for illness?


If government is to be made so small that you can drown it in like a baby kitten, who's going to protect the fetuses and insure prayer in schools? Vigilantes?


If, as Objectivists, laissez fairies, and invisible-hand holders have argued, any involvement of government in the marketplace amounts to socialism or statism; what part of Article I, Section 8's "regulate commerce" clause should I NOT interpret as the Framers' intent to establish a, again by the aforementioned's definition, the US as a "socialist" or "statist" government?


hmmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC