You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #25: Ken Salazar wasn't in the Senate yet, but I know he agreed with it. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Crunchy Frog

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Dec-02-06 06:10 AM
Response to Original message

25. Ken Salazar wasn't in the Senate yet, but I know he agreed with it.

I voted for him because I had to. It was tle lesser of two evils on that one for me. The Dems needed every Senate seat we could get, even bad Dems.

Nevertheless, he will never get my vote again. His support for the 3rd party candidate who ran against the Democrat in CT has freed me to support a 3rd party candidate against him the next time he runs, which I intend to do.

I consider myself a pragmatist, choosing the lesser of two evils. My pragmatism only goes so far though. Other people may want to call me something else. If so, I can only say that the feeling is mutual. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.