You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #70: Actually, she was right. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #57
70. Actually, she was right.
Edited on Thu May-21-09 08:28 PM by LooseWilly
I, at least, was not responding because I had other things to do. In fact, I still have other things to do... so I'll expand my Spanish vocabulary between instances of asking you what you are talking about.

I saw the clip of Anna Marie Cox asking Gibbs "... are the dismissals of these soldiers a part of the President's strategy to keep America safe, or are they a threat to national security"

As I recall, Gibbs' response was a repetition of what he'd said before. "As I said, when asked that question, last week I believe it was... the President believes that DADT should be reversed, but he's looking for a long term solution, rather than a long term fix... and he feels that Congress is the place to make those changes."

Both those quotes are actually paraphrases... but I'm watching last night's show... I'll edit to get exact quotes once I come across them (I notice you did not include any link or quote...).

In other words: Gibbs just repeated what he had said before. He didn't, as I recall, say that the Pentagon was wrong... and in any case, if you looked closely at the story, the Pentagon said that they had had "The initial stages of a preliminary conversation..." which, as I have argued, is really a very negligible amount of work for 4 months if it was in fact a priority...
Further, the Pentagon has said that it is not doing any work currently to prepare for repeal of DADT. They have also said that they are not even asking military commanders for opinions on the subject.

So, what are you talking about? Please provide some sort of link that suggests that the Pentagon was wrong...

On Edit: here's the clip on Rachel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC