You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #11: The first one was, but the second one wasn't [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

customerserviceguy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Aug-07-09 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #8

11. The first one was, but the second one wasn't

But that's not the way that Rush Limpballs and Fraud Hannity will report it.

Again, this is just a keyboard kommando at this point. Investigate him, but if all he's doing is saying, "Let's fight fire with fire," that's pretty much what people here are saying as well.

His use of "iamthemob" means he knows that we get alarmed when he uses our codewords. He could have just as easily called himself "bagthis" when we started calling them teabaggers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.