Reply #4: That isn't necessarily true. [View All]

There are key factors in the bill to assure that at least insured people aren't denied coverage. That one cannot be stuck in a job for fear of losing insurance coverage. That one cannot be removed from coverage after a condition arises, and so much more along these lines.

Is it truly okay for me to want the President (not Congress, now I'd totally hold Congress responsible with majorities that can't stand up and get the job done), but the President to actually veto a bill that does some of these really important things?

I recognize that I'm a victim, but should I be so selfish as to want to see that others that might no longer be at risk, stay at risk when their issues will be covered?