You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An idea for automated vote counting using optical scan. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Pobeka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 07:35 PM
Original message
An idea for automated vote counting using optical scan.
Advertisements [?]
(Don't split hairs with me here, this is still a concept.)
------------------------
Part 1, ballot counting:
------------------------
Build a machine, and all it can do is count the voter marks by rows A, B, C, D, ... That is literally all it does. (and it does that by a looking at a physical x-y location on the card, sort of like a punch card setup but optically performed.) You *can not* change the program in this machine.

Before the election, candidates are randomly assigned to row A,B or C (and grouped together by race). Ballots are printed according to the outcome of the random assignment.
(Random assignment is actually the weak link here, but assume it's possible).

It seems impossible to me, that you could rig the vote counting at the machine, because the machine has no knowledge of which candidate is in which row.

Only the human beings know that column "A" is the dem candidate, column "B" is the rep, and column "C" is not used, or other. So the election officials perform the logical mapping of which candidate got how many votes. It is simple.

------------------------
Part 2, final tabulation
------------------------
This is done with human beings, phones, and many pairs of eyeballs.

You then would need to phone in the results to the next "level up".
This is done, as well as the results are posted outside the polling location.

At the next "level up", the subtotals are totaled, and all of their individual results are posted, and phoned in. It would be the responsibility of all the "lower levels" to insure that their individual results as posted by the next level up was correct.

You now have a system where "many pairs of eyes" can check and cross-check at every level in the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC