You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #15: this is different in that they didn't cry fraud until the recounts, which [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform

freeplessinseattle

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Dec-25-04 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #10

15. this is different in that they didn't cry fraud until the recounts, which

implies that recounts are less secure than the original count. why is fraud not as possible in the first count?

with the Prez situation, on the other hand, we suspected fraud from the beginning, with the first count, not the recount. big diff. plus Rossi was against any recount at all, even though it was technically the law being so close, fighting even harder against the hand count, which was conducted after an even closer difference. so what gives? why would the recounts be more prone to fraud than the original count?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.