Reply #30: Heh, [View All]

I got the "warm welcome" too.

I take it a hit and run by a regular suspect is a good and relevant explanation.

It doesn´t rule out this fella being paid twice though, someone lifting the information from the PCs while in his posession without his knowledge, or similar deep conspiracy.

There are practical and economical problems when organising different types of fraud and suppression. The machines could either have information that would be either expensive, unpractical or difficult to aquire without raising suspicion by the republicans. It could also be that the lawyer where onto something good, that he was the target.

Risk vs value, stuff like high benefit positions in Washington is generally "priceless".

I doubt though that there are anything to gain by the vote protection movement by pursuing this story, without any new evidence.