You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #83: Why is well-earned criticsm seen as destructive? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #45
83. Why is well-earned criticsm seen as destructive?
Edited on Tue Dec-28-04 05:20 PM by joeunderdog
When you tell your kids that they were wrong to do something, does it make you mean? Does it make them weaker? Are you a whiner?

When you state your disagreement about how you feel your Democratic candidate is conducting his/her politics, does it automatically make you a Republican? Does it make you feel better to stay ON-MESSAGE like a good little neo-con? Are we THAT disillusioned because still believe that politicians are supposed to be a reflection of their constituents rather than vice-versa?

We are SUPPOSED to tell politicians how we feel, unless he's GWB of course. I'm actually glad we don't agree on everything, because all of those Freepers who are laughing at our disagreements stopped thinking on their own a long time ago. How f*cken rewarding. (Please-just shoot me at the first moment I try to stay on message for anything.)

Well, I've got a beef with the fact that Kerry hasn't used his political clout to galvanize support, to give that A-Hole Blackwell reason to pause everytime he breaks recount laws, to inform the sheeple by forcing MSM's hand, to bring the concept of Election Fraud into the realm of credibility and to LEAD like he promised. And as a Bostonian, if I sat next to Kerry in a bar, I'd tell him all of this, and I'll bet he'd take it like a man and listen. And after I told him how I felt, we'd still shake hands and raise a glass because he would understand. He might not agree, but he'd understand.

The bottom line is, he doesn't need all of this insulation from the critics whose passion was the esssential element of the success he had. We critics value what he had to offer, and we don't need to be called Kerry Bashers because we are criticizing his invisibility since the election. When we laid it out for him, we bought the right to criticize, to rant, to disagree and to not pretend that being on message will get us into heaven.

After all, this is America...or what's left of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC