28. That makes sense to me and I appreciate the clarification.
But that does not answer the question as to whether Ohio elections laws (as they relate to federal elections) provide the proper due process. How is it that the Supreme Court of Ohio is the only body that can hear the issue? Myers was in error when he did not recuse himself. There is a case cited in the article that reflected that Myers opinion is not subject to further review. When blatant legal conclusions are made by the reviewing court, relative to a federal election claim, what avenue does the aggrieved party have?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
