You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #95: All THEY have to do (if they can) is refute whatever evidence... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
IStriker Donating Member (408 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #89
95. All THEY have to do (if they can) is refute whatever evidence...
of fraud that is provided by the challengers. In our system, the people making the challenge must provide proof of wrong doing. If there is no proof that will stand up in a court of law, there is no challenge, just a bunch of noise.

Kerry has conceded which means acknowledging that * won the election plus he has had his lawyers say they do not believe there was any fraud involved; therefore, the burden of proof falls on US not THEM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC