You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #45: So did this affect the primary? [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform

Igel

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message

45. So did this affect the primary?

I mean, the best you get out of it based solely on her statements is that fraud could have been committed before 3/30/04. Anything else is reading info into her statement. Here testimony would be of use for establishing a record of uncertified software, but doesn't bear on whether there was uncertified software in November.

Is anybody arguing that the primary results (or other measures, whatever was on the Ohio primary ballot) were off. Of course, I'm assuming that Ohio had their primaries before 3/30, but most states do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.