117. Yowzayowzayowza, I didn’t mean to insult you –- I really didn’t think you
were being sincere.
There simply would be no way to make sure all of the machines were functioning honestly. And once they’re purchased (for millions of dollars) and in place, the voters are stuck with them.
Diebold was supposed to have certified software in all of their machines for California’s 2003 Recall election. They were in 17 counties. When a sampling of the machines was tested after the election, NOT EVEN ONE was found to have certified software.
I’m not advocating for Luddites. The simple fact is that the manufacturers of these machines want to steal elections. No amount of quality control could possibly twart their efforts.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
