You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #18: sequoia and diebold [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform

Neil B Forzod

(64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Dec-17-05 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #17

18. sequoia and diebold

Is Sequoia claiming it's over the disclosure issue? My sources on the ground tell me it's more because they still don't have a federal 2002-compliant certification and couldn't get one in time. Might be less embarrassing to blame it on the disclosure thing, I'm not sure.

I know Diebold is popular in NC, but I heard they may yet pull out. Not over disclosure, but over an unacceptable clause in the RFP. My information's less solid on that one though, and it probably bears watching. If everything pans out the way I've been told, there's a strong chance that ES&S just sweeps NC by default.

Neil

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.