I think the main problem with all this information flying around is people addressing speculation as fact --
Such as: You might be interested to know that CyberNET...
Automatically I might give weight to a statement like this --
Anyway -- I do think I read correctly regarding CyberNET now -- I don't think I've been spreading disinformation... especially since I don't understand it fully myself -- What I do understand is the actual crime itself seems to be unfolding in a way very similar to what Mr Fisher describes... which is why I say the story definitely holds water -- the who and why have yet to be present itself as concretely as the evidence of fraud.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(181 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
