You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: Illegality can be argued [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. Illegality can be argued
for two reasons: The HAVA act and state statutes and state election guidelines require that there be enough machines AND preventing voters from having a chance to vote by having lines and waits that are extreme are violations of civil rights. By the way, I read that voters who were not able to vote before the polls closed had to use provisional ballots--a virtual guarantee their votes could very well be discarded (for one reason in particular, that the four "party" representatives who determine their validity have to agree that the signatures match to the registration cards).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC