Reply #13: It's just fine... [View All]

Hi all,

Don't let this work us into a tizzy. There are plenty of other things to get real tizzied over. :)

A point made earlier in the thread may have been an underlying motive in this sure to fail motion: the judge made reference to the fact that the count was appropriate once the votes were certified. Also, the legal guys get familiar with the judge, who gets familiar with the case, which makes going back that much more easy when there is a real problem, like a stall manuever after Dec. 6th. Then the judge will be pretty much forced to side with the "glibs."

If I am understanding this right, as long as both sets of electors drops their ballots at the meeting of the electoral college, one set will get accepted and the other will be denied when these ballots are reviewed. The only hard, fast deadline is Janurary 20, 2005, because after that it would take impeachment even if we were to find Kerry, or some other candidate, one in a major landslide and Bush really lost.

Does that help? :)

Warmly,

George