You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #58: What I see in those studies... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. What I see in those studies...
...is vague talk about "correlations" and comparisons between the two extremes of no spanking at all and regular spanking. Nothing there addresses how occasional spanking might or might not work for different children.

I'm not interested in playing your little gotcha games.

Which "gotcha games" would those be?

With 2 y/o, a sharp voice is more effective than a hit. Don't know if you've been around small children, but even raising your voice (whether directed at them or not), makes them frightened and even cry.

I had the experience during my teens of living with my very young nephew when my sister, his mother, moved back home with him for a couple of years because of financial problems. While I may not have had parental responsibility, I witnessed plenty over the charming span between around six months old and the terrible twos. (It wasn't always pleasant, but it wasn't all bad either, and I spent enough time playing with my nephew that his first clear word after "mama" was my name). I saw more of his early years visiting my sister after she moved back out again.

Raising one's voice was not that terribly effective with this kid. My sister would sit and yell, and he would ignore her (and no, just in case you're wondering, his hearing was fine).

Children are not the little devious creatures the Dobsons would have us believe (and I guess you do). They want to PLEASE and be accepted. Don't mistake curiosity for rebellion.

Children aren't any one thing. A few of them are "little devious creatures", or least have that element in them to a lesser or greater degree.

Your posts had gotten much more coherent of late. I could actually read them. This one, however, reverts to your former posting gibberish.

A bullshit cheap shot. That you might disagree with something doesn't make something "gibberish" or "not coherent". Please point out clearly anything you could understand and I'll try to explain it really slowly for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC