You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: no [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
FamousBlueRaincoat Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. no
I'm still a religious person (I've posted a few other times in this forum if you're wondering where I stand).

The virgin birth story is something that really started making the cards fall for me on the christianity thing, though. It got me interested in reading the bible critically.

The key to it is this: The virgin birth story appears in two places, Matthew and Luke. The story differs greatly in those two books.

John has no mention of the virgin birth, and neither does Mark. Mark is the earliest written of the gospel. That tells you that at one point, the story was not important and probably unknown to the gospel writer. Why would he not include something like that if it were known? Jesus bursts onto John the Baptist's scene in that one.

But why did the story begin to appear? It was because of a mistranslation of a prophecy in Isaiah. The word translates from Hebrew as "young woman". But when they translated the OT from Hebrew to Greek, they chose a Greek word that *could* mean virgin. Therefore, when Gospel writers later on were trying to prove something about Jesus in regards to prophecy, they found this obscure reference to a "virgin", which doesn't exist in the original Hebrew, mind you, and if you read the actual prophecy has nothing to do with anything except for a unique situation happening during Isaiah's lifetime - they decided to just make Jesus mom into a virgin in order to prove something and to appeal to Greeks and pagans who would have found that story nice and interesting and believable.

I guess the main point of that is to say that there were very early Christians who completely believed everything there was to believe about Jesus, but did not believe in this story, because this story didn't even come about until a good 40 years after Jesus died.

Wise men visiting baby man-gods has great appeal to people for some reason - Buddha was visited by a wise man as a baby. It's probably happened elsewhere too. Not sure why - I consider myself pretty wise, but it never occurred to me to travel around looking for man-god babies. Not wise enough, I guess.

This is actually a topic that greatly interested me, but I feel that I can not do it justice. General Discussion wiped me out, what with the Wikileaks. I'll regroup and come back here tomorrow and see if anyone said anything interesting...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC