The "fresh face" argument. Yes or No? [View All]

Although I am focused on 2006 (and Kerry and other Dems are too), I was just wondering what you guys thought about the "fresh face" deal. I know here and in the MSM, blogspherians and pundits have been saying that we need a "fresh face" for 2008.

Although many don't consider Hillary a fresh face, I feel that there is one hurdle that Kerry may have to overcome if he runs again. It's the "loser" label (despite the trickery in Ohio), and the argument for experience vs. fresh face and eligibility.

Although a lot depends on the outcome of the 06 elections, I stand by my reply I made a week ago that I just didn't feel like thinking about 08. It gets tempting sometimes with all the 08 threads/articles.

I still think that by talking about 2008, we (not us) are playing right into the hands of Rove because this all takes the focus off the Bush administration and the GOP congress' woes. I am just for getting through the next two years alone.

I am new to politics (2 years) so all comments and opinions are welcome.:patriot: