Reply #275: I simply responded to your post that you hadn't seen anyone celebrating [View All]

Irwin's death. The poster said it was "good" that Irwin was dead and he got what was coming to him. That struck me as more than a tad "insensitive" and more toward well, saying it was "good" that he died. So the poster would have had to call for a "party" in order for his apparent satisfaction at Irwin's death to qualify as "celebratory?" I see. You're right. I should have noted he didn't use the party hat smilie.

And is there some obligation that one must post in every prior thread relating to a death, including those prior to membership at DU, in order to post a comment in one now? Ah. Well let me just travel back in time and join DU in 2003 to "defend" old Strom.

Perhaps you could provide a list of other threads so I can remedy similar past oversights so I may be free to comment in future on such a matter without such egregious lapses being raised. But then the "how come you didn't post in this thread" rule can be applied to other subjects as well. Oh dear.

Really. How silly.