You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #116: I disagree with your reasoning [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
116. I disagree with your reasoning
If someone isn't worth the current minimnum wage, then they should be fired. If someone's work ethic is so slack that they are pissing their time on a minimum wage job, the company should fire them and hire someone else, rather than make a claim that they should pay a lazy person less.

The lowest salary I pay (I own a company) is $15.00 an hour, which is twice what the proposed minimum wage is. 15 an hour is a living wage in my opinion. Not a great living wage, but a living one. You're right that there aren't many people on the minimum wage currently, and those that are, are generally transitory workers heading up to a higher wage, or part time work. The problem is that it's not all, and it needs to be reflected.

The minimum wage is about making sure that people aren't exploited. It's one of the reasons that our major cities are surrounded with places like this...


Holding the minimum wage down, or even getting rid of it as some conservatives advocate, would inevitably create these situations. Wages would remain depressed with no reason to rise, while the cost of living, of rent, of land, of food, would all increase. It wouldn't happen overnight, and might take years or even decades, but it would happen. The minimum wage is meant to protect the workers, to assure than every man and woman who works a full time job, get paid an amount which allows them to live in a reasonable manner. THat picture does not represent a reasonable manner.

Plus the minimum wage affects more than just those that make the minimum, but those above it. Someone making 7 an hour now, will see their pay increased above the minimum wage as well. Someone making 8 might now make 10, and so on. It helps more than just those on the lowest rung. In addition more money in the pockets of the people who will spend it has time and again been shown to boost the economy. People who make 10 dollars an hour spend it all, and each of their dollars circulates in the economy more. Businesses get that money as spending increases and the econonmy increases around it.

So I disagree with your reasoning. It will help many people, those few that stay on minimum wage for a long term, and the large number of people whos wages hover within 5-10 dollars an hour of that wage. All of them will benefit. If someone has a poor work ethic it means they should be fired, not that they shouldn't earn a decent wage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC