One of the many things that are troubling about this guy, is that he knowingly redefines words with impunity to make his "arguments".
The word "secular" does NOT mean "opposed to religion"; it merely means that the subject in question does not contain religious elements. He is actively redefining this word on every show that I've seen.
He has his audience believing that "secular humanists" are pursuing an active agenda of undermining their right to worship. This sort of illogical double talk is intentional.
Most nights I watch the first few minutes of O'R to see what he is NOT discussing, and to see what subject he is attempting to substitute for the news he obviously SHOULD be discussing.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(848 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
