You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Speedbird 38: FADEC failure or something more basic .. ran out of gas? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 06:57 PM
Original message
Speedbird 38: FADEC failure or something more basic .. ran out of gas?
Advertisements [?]
Hunt for fatal flaw of Flight 38
An electronic systems failure is emerging as the prime suspect in BA’s brush with disaster at Heathrow


After 10 hours of flying, Speedbird 038 was almost home. First Officer John Coward was preparing to land the British Airways flight from Beijing to Heathrow. In front of him on the right side of the cockpit were three screens displaying flight, navigation and engine data; another three were arrayed in front of Captain Peter Burkill, who sat on the left.

Beyond, through the cockpit windows, Coward could see central London, one of the most densely populated areas of Europe, stretch into the distance. It was Thursday lunchtime and they were approaching Heathrow from the east. There is a preference for flights into the airport to cross the capital in this direction because it is quieter than having them take off over the city. Below them, millions of people were going about their business, never imagining that a plane might fall out of the sky. (snip ..)

As Coward stared at the controls, the auto-throttle demanded more thrust. It was a normal procedure, a small adjustment intended to keep the plane at the correct speed and height. Nothing happened. The computer system again ordered more thrust. Again, no response. (snip ..)

Coward or Burkill - it is not clear which - tried to increase thrust manually. Still nothing happened. (More at link)


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article3216746.ece


Basic stuff, here. But the bit about BA running light on fuel loads intrigued me. I've heard that before.

But if Speedbird 38 was coming into London "on fumes," would they not have declared a fuel emergency? you ask. Probably so .. but maybe not. That would generate a shit-storm of paperwork.

I witnessed a KLM Boeing 747-200 land at Houston Intercontinental Airport (KIAH) in the early 1980s. They landed on runway 14L and took the high-speed turnoff in front of the Exxon corporate fleet hangar. As the 747 made the turn back up the taxiway, it stopped. All four engines had flamed out. Fuel starvation. KLM had to send a tug to tow the aircraft to the gate. The KLM crew not only said nothing to air traffic controllers about their critical fuel status, but they accepted clearance to a runway that was not the closest to their arrival route.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC